Elections are around the corner, and politicians are ambidexterous in faking things. One plates donation, and the other suddenly turns out religious. One designs new schemes (for which, government don't have funds), and the other criticizes it. One looses his moral, and the other becomes hypothetical pedagogue. Running after the votes, politicians have become spineless! Their views depends on the highly populated groups in terms of gaining mammoth amount of votes. They can do any damn thing to get that votes, from exchanging barbs with opponent to have a tea with farmers in farmland and from violating general's right to equality to persuading SC/STs by sophistry.
Now it's the time of election in MP. So why would CM Shivraj Singh be lagged behind in vocalizing jhumla. He gave a statement “Koi mai ka laal aarakshan khatm nahi kar sakta (No one can dare to abolish reservation),” and the reply came from SAPAKS "Hum hai Mai ka Lal”, we will change the status quo and clarified that this casteism won't be tolerated anymore. It was the start point of SAPAKS party's political career. A turbulence of change which challenges to morph the system from caste based to class based reservation. I don't work for SAPAKS at all, neither I am a chiromencer to analyse that how it is going to work in future, but that reply was like a tight slap on the snollygoster who sympathise with the weaker section at the time of election. This initiative has already won the hearts of many. Their mission and vision are as clear as crystal i.e to fight against SC/ST act, 1989 and to fight for the right to equality. And their argument is totally justified. Why do Mayawati want quota, when she is rich enough to enjoy her life extravagantly? If we even want to do justice in this manner, so consider Brahmins as well, because many Brahmins used to take bhiksha in the past.
Earlier, dalits were deprived, now generals are. In 72 years a country can turn from rags to riches, and here we are talking about a group of people who are developing. So why to consider them different from others? Why to make different laws for them? Why to benefit them with different facilities? They are not at all SOCIALLY BACKWARD now! They have already became a part of the creamy layer. It isn't necessary that SC/STs are always needy. The yardstick of neediness can't be measured upto a particular section of the society! Who said that the Kshatriyas and the Vaishyas can't come under BPL? Now this issue is coming on the head, bellow poverty liners are dying out of starvation and rich are getting richer.
A true vanguard is the one who expresses his views with courage, irrespective of support of followers. Making SC/STs dependent, won't work in the long run. Leading party's victory will only be the flash in the pan. The suggestion is, politicians should gather a chutzpah to be a lion-hearted, like SAPAKS which has emerged as a lava coming out of a volcano! This shows the clear warning that the group you have been neglecting since independence will retaliate and pursue the power.
Now it's the time of election in MP. So why would CM Shivraj Singh be lagged behind in vocalizing jhumla. He gave a statement “Koi mai ka laal aarakshan khatm nahi kar sakta (No one can dare to abolish reservation),” and the reply came from SAPAKS "Hum hai Mai ka Lal”, we will change the status quo and clarified that this casteism won't be tolerated anymore. It was the start point of SAPAKS party's political career. A turbulence of change which challenges to morph the system from caste based to class based reservation. I don't work for SAPAKS at all, neither I am a chiromencer to analyse that how it is going to work in future, but that reply was like a tight slap on the snollygoster who sympathise with the weaker section at the time of election. This initiative has already won the hearts of many. Their mission and vision are as clear as crystal i.e to fight against SC/ST act, 1989 and to fight for the right to equality. And their argument is totally justified. Why do Mayawati want quota, when she is rich enough to enjoy her life extravagantly? If we even want to do justice in this manner, so consider Brahmins as well, because many Brahmins used to take bhiksha in the past.
Earlier, dalits were deprived, now generals are. In 72 years a country can turn from rags to riches, and here we are talking about a group of people who are developing. So why to consider them different from others? Why to make different laws for them? Why to benefit them with different facilities? They are not at all SOCIALLY BACKWARD now! They have already became a part of the creamy layer. It isn't necessary that SC/STs are always needy. The yardstick of neediness can't be measured upto a particular section of the society! Who said that the Kshatriyas and the Vaishyas can't come under BPL? Now this issue is coming on the head, bellow poverty liners are dying out of starvation and rich are getting richer.
A true vanguard is the one who expresses his views with courage, irrespective of support of followers. Making SC/STs dependent, won't work in the long run. Leading party's victory will only be the flash in the pan. The suggestion is, politicians should gather a chutzpah to be a lion-hearted, like SAPAKS which has emerged as a lava coming out of a volcano! This shows the clear warning that the group you have been neglecting since independence will retaliate and pursue the power.
No comments:
Post a Comment